Can editors publish in JATR?
Yes, but such manuscripts are handled independently by another editor with full transparency.
Defining the ethical, procedural, and professional duties of editors in ensuring research integrity and academic transparency.
Editors of the Journal of Addiction Therapy and Research (JATR) are entrusted with maintaining the scientific quality and ethical integrity of the publication process. Their primary responsibility is to ensure that all manuscripts are reviewed and published according to international best practices as outlined by COPE, ICMJE, and WAME.
Editorial Philosophy: Fairness, transparency, and accountability in every editorial decision.
Editors must actively identify and address ethical breaches, including:
When misconduct is suspected, editors must follow COPE’s flowcharts for handling ethical complaints and coordinate with the publisher’s ethics committee.
Editors oversee the peer-review process to ensure balanced, unbiased evaluations. They must verify that:
Final decisions must reflect a balanced interpretation of reviewer feedback.
Decisions are guided by academic quality, not commercial or personal interests. Editors should:
Editors must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that could influence their decisions. When a conflict exists, the manuscript should be reassigned to an independent editor.
Editors must promote inclusion and equity across gender, geography, and discipline. JATR encourages balanced representation in its editorial board, reviewer pool, and published content.
Editors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the published record. They must coordinate corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern following COPE Retraction Guidelines.
Editors should participate in continuous professional development through:
Yes, but such manuscripts are handled independently by another editor with full transparency.
Editors must follow JATR’s Author Appeal Policy ensuring fair re-evaluation by independent reviewers.
Yes. Editors must act promptly on reports of reviewer bias, breach of confidentiality, or ethical violations.