Review Article

Drug treatment and rehabilitation in China: Theoretical rationales and current situations

Gloria Yuxuan Gu*

Published: 18 February, 2021 | Volume 5 - Issue 1 | Pages: 009-011

Global drug use has reached epidemic levels, with approximately 269 million drug users worldwide [1]. Problematic drug use may lead to serious physical, social, and mental health problems. An estimated 167,000 deaths attributed to drug-related disorders worldwide in 2017 [2]. The rising global drug use and its severe adverse consequences make the drug treatment/rehabilitation a top priority for policymakers. In modern China, illicit drug use has raised great concern from both the academia and the public. Nearly 2.15 million Chinese were registered as drug users in 2019 [28]. Drug-related crimes and deaths are also increasing [29]. The current drug treatment programs in China are mainly compulsory, addressing coercion and discipline. However, the effectiveness was found to be low [3]. Situated in the fields of social work, public health, and psychology, Chinese scholars and practitioners have conducted some empirical tests for these drug treatment/rehabilitation programs and already found several effective preventive factors in the programs. However, the existing research on the design and evaluation of Chinese drug treatment/rehabilitation programs rarely investigate the theoretical rationales behind these programs. This study would address three criminological theories that have been applied to explain drug treatment and rehabilitation in Western societies: Differential Association Theory, Social Bonding Theory, and Labeling Theory. Similar theoretical rationales could be learnt and adopted by Chinese programs. 

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jatr.1001015 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2020. https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2020/field/WDR20_BOOKLET_1.pdf
  2. GBoDC N. Global burden of disease study 2017 (GBD 2017) socio-demographic index (SDI) 1950–2017. Seattle, United States Inst Heal Metrics Eval. 2018.
  3. Simpson DD, Sells SB. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1982; 2: 7–29.
  4. Sutherland E, Cressey D. Criminology, eight edition. Philadelphia/New York/Toronto: JB Lippincott Company; 1970.
  5. Goff C, Gilbert G. Edwin H. Sutherland: The Development of Differential Association Theory. In: The Origins of American Criminology. 2018.
  6. Akers RL. Criminological theories: Introduction and evaluation. Routledge; 2013.
  7. Karakos HL. Positive peer support or negative peer influence? The role of peers among adolescents in recovery high schools. Peabody J Educ. 2014; 89: 214–228. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24839335/
  8. McKay JR, Van Horn D, Rennert L, Drapkin M, Ivey M, et al. Factors in sustained recovery from cocaine dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 45: 163–172. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696509/
  9. Weiss RD, Griffin ML, Gallop RJ, Najavits LM, Frank A, et al. The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005; 77: 177–184. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15664719/
  10. Liu L, Huijuan D. Research on the maintenance of drug use behavior by Chinese female drug users. Population and Development 2015; 4-81.
  11. Xuelian Z. Anomie and Regression: A Sociological Analysis of Criminal Sociology of Young Women’s Drug Abuse Career Exit. Chinese Youth Studies. 2020; 73-79.
  12. Hirschi T. A control theory of delinquency. Criminol theory Sel Class Readings. 1969; 1969: 289–305.
  13. Cassino P, Rogers W. Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory Nearly 45 Years Later: A comparison of a traditional, contemporary and hybrid model. Theory in Action. 2016.
  14. Chapple CL, Hope TL, Whiteford SW. The direct and indirect effects of parental bonds, parental drug use, and self-control on adolescent substance use. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2005; 14: 17–38.
  15. Zavala E, Spohn RE, Alarid LF. Gender and serious youth victimization: assessing the generality of self-control, differential association, and social bonding theories. Sociol Spectr. 2019; 39: 53–69.
  16. Knight DK, Simpson DD. Influences of family and friends on client progress during drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse. 1996; 8: 417–429. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9058354/
  17. Liu L, Wang H, Chui WH, Cao L. Chinese drug users’ abstinence intentions: The role of perceived social support. J Drug Issues. 2018; 48: 519–535.
  18. Xiong H, Jia J. Situational Social Support and Relapse: An Exploration of Compulsory Drug Abuse Treatment Effect in China. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019; 63: 1202–1219. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30501427/
  19. Becker HS. Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. Vol. 29, New York: Free Press. 1963.
  20. Bernburg, JG. Labeling theory. In Handbook on crime and deviance. Springer. Cham. 2019; 179-196.
  21. Anderson TL. Types of identity transformation in drug-using and recovery careers. Sociol Focus. 1993; 26: 133–145.
  22. Biernacki P. Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Temple University Press; 1986.
  23. Luoma JB, Twohig MP, Waltz T, Hayes SC, Roget N, et al. An investigation of stigma in individuals receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addict Behav. 2007; 32: 1331–1346. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17092656/
  24. Myers B, Fakier N, Louw J. Stigma, treatment beliefs, and substance abuse treatment use in historically disadvantaged communities. Afr J Psychiatry. 2009; 12: 218-222. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19750251/
  25. Deng R, Li J, Sringernyuang L, Zhang K. Drug abuse, HIV/AIDS and stigmatisation in a Dai community in Yunnan, China. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 64: 1560–1571. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17257727/
  26. Yang M, Mamy J, Gao P, Xiao S. From abstinence to relapse: a preliminary qualitative study of drug users in a compulsory drug rehabilitation center in Changsha, China. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0130711. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26107639/
  27. Meng J, Burris S. The role of the Chinese police in methadone maintenance therapy: A literature review. Int J Drug Policy. 2013; 24: e25–34. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23623719/
  28. Commission NNC. Annual report on drug-using situation in China. Natl Narcotics Control Comm. 2019.
  29. Liu L, Hsiao SC. Chinese Female Drug Users’ Experiences and Attitudes With Institutional Drug Treatment. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018; 62: 4221–4235. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478389
  30. Liu L, Chui WH, Chen Y. Violent and non-violent criminal behavior among young chinese drug users: A mixed methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15: 432. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29498649/
  31. Bull M, Denham G, Trevaskes S, Coomber R. From punishment to pragmatism: Sharing the burden of reducing drug-related harm. Chinese J Comp Law. 2016; 4: 300–316.
  32. Liu L, Chui WH. Rehabilitation policy for drug addicted offenders in China: current trends, patterns, and practice implications. Asia Pacific J Soc Work Dev [Internet]. 2018; 28: 192–204.
  33. Zhang SX, Chin KL. A People’s War: China’s struggle to contain its illicit drug problem. Improv Glob Drug Policy Comp Perspect UNGASS 2016; 2015; 1–15. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Papers/2015/04/global-drug-policy/A-Peoples-War-final.pdf?la=en

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?